DA Arrears Calculator 1.7.2024 for 3 Months7th Pay Commission Recommendations has begun to emerge!
“It doesn’t come as a surprise that even bits and morsels of information about the recommendations, which is being eagerly expected by nearly 50 lakh employees and pensioners, make headlines.”
The 7th Pay Commission Recommendations have started to surface, and it’s no surprise that even the smallest pieces of information are making headlines. Nearly 50 lakh employees and pensioners are eagerly awaiting the recommendations, and with the report being finalized, some workable recommendations have already been released to the media.
In 2006, rumors about the 6th Pay Commission report circulated due to delays in submitting it to the government. However, with the rise of the internet, it has become easier to trace the origin of information and reduce rumors. This time around, information was given by leaders of Federations, but it’s difficult to determine their accuracy.
With government and employee federation websites, information can spread quickly and be retracted just as fast, killing rumors immediately. Readers can now differentiate between news and rumors thanks to various individual websites and blogs covering Central Government employee news.
Click the below link for 7th CPC Calculator
EXPECTED PAY SCALE CALCULATOR OF 7th PAY COMMISSION
Respected sir.
Promotion Rank should be given to the government police and force jawans by the seniority basis..
Respected Sir,
1. I would like to invite your kind attention towards upgrading of grade pay from Rs 4200 to Rs 6600 in PB 3 to General Manager, Departmental canteen working in ministry of Defence under the Administrative Instructions of D O P&T. It is requested to save the goodwill of the apex post of canteen i.e. General Manager hence he is controlling and managing the 22 to57 staff of canteen , performing a job of Reporting Officer during the completion of ACRs of staff and their responsibility as Incharge of Canteen. The apex post of the General Manager in the hierachy of the Non Statutory canteen employees cadre has always been filled by promotion from the feeder grades of D. G. M., Manager Grade II, and Manager cum Accountant etc.after the experience of ten years as per new modell RRs. Due to merger of pay scales by 6thCPC General Manager carrying the same grade pay as per their juniors Manager Grade II , DGM and Accountant cum Manager of feeder grade i.e. Rs 4200 which is cause of functional disturbance. Befor 6thCPC GM was in the scale of 5500-9000 and Manager Grade II etc were in 5000-8000 pay scales. This can be seen from the hierachical chart of canteen cadre post at para 3 after the Vth CPC, when the feeder grades of D.G.M etc were upgraded to Rs 5000-8000 from Rs 4000-6000, then also consequently SIU D.O.P&T upgraded the pay scale of General Manager from Rs 5000-8000 to Rs 5500-9000, A similar situation has now taken place whereby the apex post of General Manager has been brought at par with the feeder grades i.e Manager gd II, D.G.M etc. This anomaly warrants reconsideration on lines of post Vth CPC upgradation order of D.O.P&T OM No. 13/10/2001-Dir(c) dated 22 Dec. 2004.
2. Designation of Manager gd II should be replaced as Manager because there is no post of Manager gd I in Departmental Canteen of Ministry of Defence , Therefore the designation of Manager gd II in the absence of Manager gd I does not arise. Please take on priority and include in the agenda of next meeting of Anomaly Committee and Cadre Review committee of Non Statutory Departmental Canteen Employees as deemed fit.
3. I request our Executive Members of National Council JCM to raise the issue in positive manner please.
Your favourable action in this matter will be highly obliged
.
A K GARG
General Secretary
AFHQ Canteen Employees Association (Recognized by Ministry of Defence)
Ministry of Defence, New Delhi.
Mobile No. 9868127027.
Yes, completely agree. Retiring at the age of 33 years of service will, in my humble opinion, be total waste of human resource – both in terms of capability and experience that that workforce can bring and impart to their younger peers.
You are right. No one get settle in this age group as in today culture everyone is getting married late. So govt has to consider 60 retirement age not service.
Respected Hon’ble sir,
We are belongs from paramilitary force now declared capf.We are ex-serviceman of capf. We are watching TV and hearing the news that One portion of the Defence retired accepted the PM recommendations and the other is continuing strugle for their benefits.. When the paramilitary forces retired Border-sectrifires will get to express their girevances to the Honble PM as well as with Country ‘s Supreem Court-Public of Nation as the system suggested that only the OROP is given to Ex defence forces and not to Paramilitary forces. Vote your views. We are ready to scrifies. To live in such circumstances, which degrade the honour of Forces those are fighting shoulder to shoulder.This mathodology deffinately defete the moral of Forces presently working in Naxtal areas as well as on LAC/LOC.. In previous Govt till the date , later or sooner Forces are getting all benefits some how not at par but extent to similier. THe OROP degraded shamefully. In 24 to 25 lakhs retired personnel of Defence there are little percentage those are leaving the defence after 15 years otherwise as per their service chart people served from 15 years to 38 years are all not the age of 45 years and they retired after 52 yr of age is majority. This should be examined from available data Forcesw are retired after 57 years age now earlier 55years respectively. We are happy that Big brother are getting their dues from nation but the younger brother who served for 24×7 =365 days on hardship and those are serving at about 9 lakhs and retireted about 3 lakhs be provide due share by the Govt as applicable.
jaihind, jaibhart
formula of one rank one pension also required for civilian employees
pension must be 100% or equal to last pay drawn for 30 years plus service as expense do not come down after retirement,this system of 100% pension is in many country with hereditary pension as in france/please check at pondichery
with old age and retirement expense increase as you have to leave govt quarter,phone,news paper,guest housed etc etc
SO PENSION EQUAL TO LAST PAY DRAWN IS MUST AT PAR WITH UK AND OTHER COUNTRIES WITH FACILITY FOR UPGRADATION WITH FORMULA OF ONE POST ONE PENSION
Respected Sir, 7th pay commission is recommending retirement age after total service 33 years or 60 years age which is earlier. This recommendation implement for new appointment after implementation of 7th CPC, not for who are already in service. Because in this age nobody can do anything in the age of 53, and at the time of appointment no was mentally prepared. So please this point may be review once again.
I am not agree with the retirement policy .this is not a proper decession that if you are already of 33yrs in job you r retired even if your age is less than 58 yr.
OROP SHOULD BE GRANTED TO ALL GOVT EMPLOYEES AS PER THEIR DIFFERENT WORKING SITUATIONS AND THEIR SERVICE CONDITIONS. As of now no security organization should be kept outside of its ambit ie Armed forces including BSF CRPF RPF ITBP AND SO MANY OTHERS.
Other thing armed forces should be given Pension as per BP AS of now Plus an equal rank allowance.
Good decision for retirment age. Please do this soon. It will help for many youngsters without job. 33 yrs and 60 age is correct decision. PLEASE IMPLEMENT THIS 33 YEARS OR 60 AGE SERVICE
The pension of ex-servicemen must be reasonable instead of outdated ie fictious
Army men are forced to retired at a age of 35 years,with less pension about ₹ 10500, it is too unjustic to think, after all who is responsible to protect the previlliges of those who protect INDIA
Respected Sir, So many people got job in age of 18 to 20 years, Now it is come to know that 7th pay commission is recommending retirement age after total service 33 years or 60 years age which is earlier. So they have already completed 33 years service and what they are getting as salary it is too much or overpaid without dong any risky job, they are non-performing asset to government. for the better of the youth and job seekers it is a very good decision. .Needles to mention that their services may be added if employee is fit medically and performing his/her duties as expected.
This rumour or fact whatever it is…is almost acting as a slow poison for all those who are going to be affected by early retirement policy at age of 58 or 33 year of service…!!
This decision may provide employement to many but what about those who will be left with nothing..!!
Its very unfair and other people who are supporting this decision should understand the problem..
How can u retire them all of sudden
..will there be compensation for those
?
What if a employees retirement month
is january 2016 under the 33 year of service criteria ..will govt retire them first and they will be deprived of the benefit of 7 pay commission.
God bless govt…hope there will be solution to it !
should give special incentives for international degree holders
58 years age ok
Sir , Retirement Service of 33 Years Service is Vicissitude With Staff. Because Staff is not prepare to retirement.
Please sent 7th pay commission report in hindi
Minimum age for entry into govt service is 18 years; so, if a person is appointed at the age of 18-19 years, should he retire at the age of 51-52?! Is it not harsh for a person?
Very good news regarding 33 years of retirement , young generation will get jobs. I am very happy…
Sir,
The retirement age should not reduced to 58 years or 33 years service, as now a days , the employee gets very late marriage. As a result they get late issue and due to the higgher studies , their sons and daughters not being settled and get marriage in time. If they retirement age is reduced , the libilities and responsibilities will not completed which will be frustrating and unjustified to the officials.
Sir,
The pay anomaly in 6th cpc for the officials in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 was merged in GP 4200 which was disadvantageous to them , should be given justice in this pay commission. The retirement age of 60 years should not be reduced to 58 years, because the life expectancy is raised considerably and due to late marriage of employee nowadays the liabilities of marriage of their sons/daughters are being not completed. If suddenly they retire before 60 years ,it will be shocked to them and very frustrating. They will not able to complete their liabilities. The minimum pay scales to the Group B Gazetted officer shoulld be GP Rs. 5400/- The anomoly of pay among the CCS Cadre and Subordinate Cadre be removed. As the duties and responsibilities in the subordinate cadre are multifarious as compared to CCS Cadre but their pay scales are not sufficient. The engineers in cpwd are holding the post of babus and grabbed the promotional avenues of babus. Their post should be utilized in engineering fields
All are discussing about the retirement criteria. Actually the retirement criteria should be 62 years of age or 32 years of service whichever is earlier. 32 years of service is not a very small period of the life. As per this criteria unemployed children will be benefited. This Govt.will accept this type of recommendation because Shri Modi has promised in the election to provide job to the unemployed youths.
THE PRESENT WORKING EMPLOYEES MAY BE GIVEN A CHANCE TO WORK FOR FURTHER TWO YEARS SO THAT THEY CAN OVER COME THEIR FAMILY RESPONSIBILITIES BECAUSE THEY PURELY DEPEND UPON THE SALARIES OR YOU REDUCE TH SUPERANNUATION AGE MAY PLEASE BE BRING BACK 58 YEARS OF AGE IRRESPECTIVE OF CPC’S IDEA I.E., 33/60.
what is news regarding pre mature retirement. I means age and service
Seventh Central Pay Commission are creating a fear in the mind of Govt. employees on the subject retirement age, completion of 33 years service or 60 years which ever is earlier. More than family’s status was not in a good position when his family member was join the government service near about age of 20 years, now he will be retire age of 53 years as per the 7th pay commission. In this condition 53 years is not a retirement age for any person, who has to complete their responsibilities i.e. children’s educations and other responsibilities etc.,. In this condition their dependent family members face many problems. I am suggested not to take the matter of retirement on completion 33 years service. It should be only at the age of 58 or 60 years.
Restriction of 33 years of service or 60 years of age whichever is earlier for superannuation will stand-way kill us, It would be as like as hang to death/compulsory retirement on incapability for ill-health.This would be opposite disheartening action to the commitment given by the NDA reign for the welfare of poor employees, thus betrayal of truth ” Asse din anewala hei”. Because, this action would lead to harming the only Group’C’ and Group ‘D’ employees at the most belonging to poor category only who were forced to enter into job at the early age of 18/20/21/22/23 years of age and so on after matriculation/higher secondary/Diploma/graduation without having had the ability/facility for higher study to capture the Group ‘A’ posts directly. Even after struggling for whole life, they can not go up because, they are loading the burden of running poor family members since joining in the posts. I entered into the group ‘C’ post in 1983 at the age of 20 years and could not go up any way till to-date because of family burden(feeding of parents, unmarried/unemployed sisters & brothers). I got married at the age of 49 years, got a female child who is now 2 years & 7 months old. At the normal retirement age of 60 years, my daughter will be of only 10 years of age and I have to her study cost with meagre pension only. My wife who is graduate and 3 years Engineering Diploma in Computer Science (soft ware)left the private job to look after the only child at home town, Guwahati ( now giving me company as house wife in rented house at Jorhat town as I work at village:- Lahdoigarh, Jorhat district which is 350 km away from Guwahati). As per the criteria, if implemented by GOI, I have to go on compulsory retirement in the wake of completion of 33 years of service at the age of 53 years in April, 2016. It would be a great shock to my wife as both of us will be unemployed couple with uncertain fraternity. Kindly review the thought and ideas of such capital punishment in the greater interest of the poor employees’ family members livelihood/growing life.
WE REQUEST TO DROP FOR 58YRS R.AGE OR 33 SERVICE// IF THIS RULE COMES 95% EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WILL COMES ON THE ROADS AND BECOMES BEGGERS, BECAUSE BEING GOVT. EMPLOYYE THE BANKS ARE GIVE LOANS AND WE ARE TAKEN FOR HOUSE BUILDING LOANS, PERSONAL LOANS, EDUCATION LOANS, HEALTH INSURANCE KEEPING A VIEW TO RETIRE AT AGE OF 60 YRS.. PL DO NOT MAKE US BEGGERS. PL AND KINDLY FIGHT FOR THIS// IN CASE VERY DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE 60 YRS R.AGE THEN ASK FOR GOLDEN AND SHAKE HAND AND ALSO GIVE A GOVT. JOB FOR THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS /// THX
If the recommendation regarding criteria for retirement is true, it is nothing but shocking!! It will play havoc with the lives of not only of employees but also their dependent family members.
All the govt. employees begin plans for their post-retirement life around 50 years of age. Around the age when this recommendation will force majority of employees to retire, the Govt. employees may have liabilities like children aspiring for higher education, daughters to be married, EMIs to be paid for home loan, etc. With this recommendation all such plans of an employees will go for a six and bring the employees on the road.
Employees who joined the service at a young age, say 20-25 years will be forced to retire between 53-58 years of age. Majority of employees join service by 25 years of age. This recommendation will effectively fix the retirement age at a maximum of 58 years for a majority and 53, 54……57 for those who joined the service at younger age than 25 years.
As this recommendation is surely going to bring majority of Govt. employees to a desperate and helpless situation adversely affecting their dependent family members and their own post-retirement lives, the 7th Pay Commission should not make this recommendation. If at all this recommendation is made, the Govt. should reject it outrightly, considering the hardships it will force on majority of its employees
Please provide information on National Pension System if any ,from 7th CPC.
Sir,
The news in the 7th Central Pay Commission are confusing and create a fear in most of the employees on the subject retirement age, completion of 33 years service or 60 years which ever is earlier. Most of the persons becasue of below poverty line of their family status, are forced to join a goverment job at the age of below 20 years by leaving their dreams of higher studies. If a person joined in government service at the age of 20 years, he will be retire at the age of 53 years as per the 7th pay commission news. 53 years is not a retirement age for any person, who has to complete children’s educations and other family liabilities etc.,. Hence, it is suggested not to take the criteria of retirement on completion 33 years service. It should be only at the age of 60 years as earlier pay commission.
33 years in service or the age of 60 (whichever comes early) as the criteria for superannuation is much awaited recommendation by unemployed youth of our country. Being a central Govt. employee, I welcome this recommendation.
The recommendation of retirement after completion of 33 years of service or 60 whichever is early if it is true has been suggested by the 7th pay commission probably to improve employment of youth. It may be a good step but if accepted very large number of people will retire very soon in 2016, may be sometime in Jan 2016. Has the government catered for this huge outflow of cash in their budget for 2015-2016. They are already complaining about the likely burden of OROP and 7th pay commission scales. This will further accentuate their anxiety if accepted. However it is definitely an innovative idea
If the recommendation regarding criteria for retirement is true, it is nothing but shocking!! It will play havoc with the lives of not only of employees but also their dependent family members.
All the govt. employees begin plans for their post-retirement life around 50 years of age. Around the age when this recommendation will force majority of employees to retire, the Govt. employees may have liabilities like children aspiring for higher education, daughters to be married, EMIs to be paid for home loan, etc. With this recommendation all such plans of an employees will go for a six and bring the employees on the road.
Employees who joined the service at a young age, say 20-25 years will be forced to retire between 53-58 years of age. Majority of employees join service by 25 years of age. This recommendation will effectively fix the retirement age at a maximum of 58 years for a majority and 53, 54……57 for those who joined the service at younger age than 25 years.
As this recommendation is surely going to bring majority of Govt. employees to a desperate and helpless situation adversely affecting their dependent family members and their own post-retirement lives, the 7th Pay Commission should not make this recommendation. If at all this recommendation is made, the Govt. is humbly requested to reject it outrightly, considering the hardships it will force on majority of its employees.
WHAT IS BASIC OF PENSIONERS AS PER 7CPC.WHILE RETIRED A NK AS 30/09/2008 OF ARMY
Good news regarding 33 year of service for retirement,young generation will get jobs
Retirement age may be reduce 60 to 58 but 33 yrs service instead of 60 or 58 should not be accept by All union & also by governMany of India. Many people take HB loan, education loan etc through their service life. So they may face very difficult situation to maintain their family life if the unwise dicission happen. If a employee got his service age of 20 yrs to be fail in danger now.
I am not agree to it
Sir, my retirement date is 30/09/2015. after 35 year service. I am nurvas after 3 months new pay commission released January, 16. but in my mind after retirement my retirement benefit re-fix or not ? I dont know. please if possible explain me for our satisfaction.
EVERY FRUIT IS GOOD FOR SOMETHING, SOME ONE AND BAD OR WORST FOR SOME OTHERS. POISON IS NEEDED BECAUSE IT KILLS PAIN. SO EVEN POISON IS GOOD FOR SOME AND WORST FOR SOME OTHERS.
EVERY RECOMMENDATION OF 7TH CPC HAVE THE SAME EFFECT. SOME ARE GOOD, NOT BEST BUT THE DREAMS OF GOVT EMPLOYEES AND PENSIONERS NEVER COME TRUE. MAY BE BITTER, SORE, OR SWEET TO SOME. NONE CAN MAKE A BEST FRUIT FOR THE COMPLETE SATISFACTION AND PLEASURE OF THE MANKIND.
BE HAPPY WITH WHAT IS AND WAIT FOR THE NEXT WHEN IT WILL BE DUE.
Good Thinking…Keep it up..!
Respected Sir, I got job in age of 20 years, Now it is come to know tha 7th pay commission is recommending retirement age after total service 33 years or 60 years age which is earlier. So I completing 33 years service at age 53 years. this age is not retirement age because in this age nobody can do anything and his children are not married and all responsibilities are still to done. So please this point may be review once again. Secondly one point may be added that if employee is fit medically than provision for extension should be done.