Expected DA Calculator from January 2021 (Updated Nov 2020)MACP Chart on Revised Grading with Illustrations
ACR and APAR Grading of “Good” for the period 2012-13 to 2015-16 is to be treated as “Very Good”.
ACR / APAR Grading for MACP – Benchmark Example No. 1 (3G + 2VG) (5VG)
| Illustration – 1 | ||
| Benchmark – Very Good (Eligible for Financial Upgradation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Period | ACR / APAR Grading |
To be treated as (For MACPS) |
| 2012-13 | Good | Very Good |
| 2013-14 | Good | Very Good |
| 2014-15 | Good | Very Good |
| 2015-16 | Very Good | Very Good |
| 2016-17 | Very Good | Very Good |
ACR / APAR Grading for MACP – Benchmark Example No. 2 (4G + 1VG) (5VG)
| Illustration – 2 | ||
| Benchmark – Very Good (Eligible for Financial Upgradation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Period | ACR / APAR Grading |
To be treated as (For MACPS) |
| 2012-13 | Good | Very Good |
| 2013-14 | Good | Very Good |
| 2014-15 | Good | Very Good |
| 2015-16 | Good | Very Good |
| 2016-17 | Very Good | Very Good |
ACR / APAR Grading for MACP – Benchmark Example No. 3 (2BG + 1G + 1VG + 1OS) (2VG + 2BG + OS)
| Illustration – 3 | ||
| Benchmark – Below Very Good (Not eligible for Financial Upgradation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Period | ACR / APAR Grading |
To be treated as (For MACPS) |
| 2012-13 | Below Good (0) | Below Good |
| 2013-14 | Below Good (0) | Below Good |
| 2014-15 | Good | Very Good |
| 2015-16 | Very Good | Very Good |
| 2016-17 | Outstanding | Outstanding |
ACR / APAR Grading for MACP – Benchmark Example No. 1 (5G) (4VG + G)
| Illustration – 4 | ||
| Benchmark – Very Good (Eligible for Financial Upgradation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Period | ACR / APAR Grading |
To be treated as (For MACPS) |
| 2012-13 | Good | Very Good |
| 2013-14 | Good | Very Good |
| 2014-15 | Good | Very Good |
| 2015-16 | Good | Very Good |
| 2016-17 | Good | Good |
ACR / APAR Grading for MACP – Benchmark Example No. 1 (1BG + 3G + 1VG) (4VG + BG)
| Illustration – 5 | ||
| Benchmark – Below Very Good (Not eligible for Financial Upgradation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Period | ACR / APAR Grading |
To be treated as (For MACPS) |
| 2012-13 | Below Good (0) | Below Good |
| 2013-14 | Good | Very Good |
| 2014-15 | Good | Very Good |
| 2015-16 | Good | Very Good |
| 2016-17 | Very Good | Very Good |
The financial upgradation would be on non-functional basis subject to fitness in the hierarchy of pay band and grade pay within PB-1. In the above statement it appears that the APAR bench mark (good, very Good etc.) are not applicable to Pay band-1. I kindly requested to clarify the statement and any detailed OM or order is available please provide