The Department of Personnel and Training has issued an official memorandum regarding the Periodic Review of Central Government Employees for the purpose of strengthening administration under Fundamental Rule (FR) 56(j)/(I) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 [now, rule 42 of CCS(Pension) Rules, 2021]. The memorandum emphasizes the importance of adhering to the timelines outlined in paragraph 4 of the aforementioned O.M. dated 28.08.2020. It should be noted that comprehensive instructions on this matter were previously issued on August 28, 2020, via DoPT’s O.M. No.2 5013/ 03/2019-Estt.A-IV. All Ministries and Departments are expected to comply with these guidelines.
Retirement Age Controversy Begins Again
7TH PAY COMMISSION BASIC PAY CALCULATOR
(UPDATED ON 20.11.2015)
Retirement Age of Central Government Employees Controversy Begins Again
“Retirement age for Central Government employees is 60 years now. It was raised to 60 from 58 in 1998(Dopt order), when the then NDA Government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee”
Last year, there were rumours that the centre was planning to raise the retirement age from 60 to 62. This time, retirement age makes headlines one again that the superannuation age may be decreased to 58.
Last week the most popular website for CG Employees, www.gservants.com has published an article about the recommendations of 7th CPC, as unconfirmed news. In this, 7th CPC may recommend for reduce in age of retirement of CG Employees will be in two criteria. The retirement age as the completion of 33 years of service, or at the age of 60, whichever comes first. The panic was further increased by similar claims on Facebook and Whatsapp also, because the criteria for retirement as at the age of 58 or completion of 33 years.
CLICK TO READ ALL THE ARTICLES ABOUT THE RETIREMENT AGE OF CG EMPLOYEES
If an employee joins central government services at the age of 27, he would complete 33 years of service at the age of 60. If he had joined the services before the age of 27, his position becomes tricky. If someone joins the central government services soon after graduation, at the age of 20, he will be forced to retire at the age of 53.
On the internet, this condition was distorted as 33 years of service or 58 years of age, whichever comes first. This caused great worry to all because the 60/33 rule would affect only those who had joined the service before the age of 26, but the 58/33 rule would lead to all those who had joined after the age of 28 to lose two years of service. Also worth noticing is the fact that the service period is very short in such cases.
Nobody is sure yet if the 7th Pay Commission will include the recommendations on retirement age in its report to the government. But, discussions were held on this issue. There is no information about when the decision will be implemented.
Before May 1998 – 58 Years
After May 1998 – 60 Years and …!
Reducing 60 to 58 is like ‘losing the sword and growing the tail.’
Source: www.cgstaffnews.in
The retirement age for officers may be fixed at 58 years or 33 years of service which is earlier. For class three and four the retirement age may be sixty years. The officer may manage his income after retirement and it is difficult for a lower group to manage and having less pension.
Yes.retirement age should be 58 years or 33years service which ever is earlier is the best option to provide employment opportunity to young educated generation.
Retirement age should be 33 years of regular service or 58 years of age which ever is earlier. It will be helpful in eradicating unemployment in the country
Raj Kishore Sharma, Kapurthala.
retirement age should be 58/33 yrs .of service
CAPFS KO V OROP MILNA CHAHIYE
AGAR CAPFS KO OROP NAHI MILEGATO
BAGAWAT KARENGE
The retirement age should be 60/33yrs I.e.
60 yrs of age or 33yrs of service
As per my opinion is concerned I don’t agree with 33 yrs of service as retirement age because it creates panic or destroys everything of those employs who are appointed before 27 yr age.so it creates crises among the large number of people. It should not be implemented .
what is the main provision of rules and regulation in seventh pay commission expected by central government of India New Delhi kindly mention the actual age of reteirement from service 60/33 is correct.
Considering the un-employment in the country it will be a excellent move, if implemented. Yes, I agr
It is a very good proposal of govt for police and force personal it is a need of time old age personal can not do as much better as young personal as there condition of job is different from other central government employee so the retirement age should be 33 years of service or 60 years which ever is earlier
It is a very good proposal of govt for police and force personal it is a need of time old age personal can not do as much better as young personal as there condition of job is different from other central government employee
The retirement age may be fix to 60 years or 33 years of service witch ever is earlier
I personally suggest after 33 yes of service one of the dependent can be given job so as to enable the young generation to settle at their early age.its a benefit for the government as the salary of the new recruit will be only one third or even less than the 33 yrs serviced person kindly analyse .
If maximum service period is 33 years then why the minimum age for vacancies is 18 years it means to loss for those persons who has taken job between 18 to 27 years of age. One other thing is that for unreserved candidates maximum age for vacancies is 27 generally more than 80%vacancies then what they should do either don’t take job other wise ready for loss of service period and that is 1 to 9 years
Retirement age must be the SAME and FIXED for all employee, it should not be based on NO. of years of qualifying ,as because every employee has planned their future
by keeping in mind the age of Retirement at 60 years. Govt cannot change his policies just like that.
I am too not at all able to digest the retirement at 33 yrs of service. ..as I couldn’t built a house and staying in a rented accommodation both at my working place and at children’s education place….took education loan…children are still pursuing hr studies…
Perhaps central Government has forgotted article 309 of IPC. Before election of parliament 2014 they misguiided the people and form Govtt. New report will be not accepted by Employees of India.. A great agitation is sure .D.A should merge and fix pay scale. 33-60 will be not accepted.
VERY BAD PROPOSAL by the Govt. if this Govt. starts to count the Number of years of qualifying Service for Compulsory Retirement from Service.
Retirement age should be the same for all employees.
Several Employees have several dependants. Moreover, who join under Bread Winner quotas has also several liabilities and dependants family members along with dependent mothers with them.
Many of employees have taken House Building Loan of 30 years tenure. Hence those employee who have completed already 8 or 10 years of Service and has Several Member Dependent upon him – have to take long tenure Loan of 30 years for LOW Monthly EMIs recently by keeping loan tenure up to 60 years of age.
Hence, if any employee who has already completed 8 to 10 years of Service, will not be able to complete any Loan which is of 30 years tenure as because, if he has to retire at much early age – at just the age of just 52 or 53 years, far below the age of normal retirement..
Moreover 52 or 53 years of age can never be an age of Retirement for any Employee.
Is early appointment in Service is a matter of punishment for any CG Employee?
This is very bad proposal as because RETIREMENT AGE should be the SAME and FIXED for all, whether it is 58 years or 60 years of age.
Why then ministers are still Governing India far above 60 years of age?, if anyone has the ability, then why he should be deprived from Service at early age – far below the age of Normal Retirement of 60 yrs – along with his family and children – which is a matter to sit at road?
Moreover there is NO PENSION for all Central Govt employee who has joined after 2005.
Hence RETIREMENT AGE MUST BE the SAME and Fixed for all employees, it should not be based on the number of years of qualifying Service, as because every employee has planned their future by keeping in mind the age of Retirement at 60 years.
Govt. may increase employment by filling up thousands of posts lying Vacant in several Govt. Departments like Income Tax, Railways, MHRD, Universities and so on – instead of Surrendering the number of Several hundreds and thousands of Govt Post lying vacant each year by surrendering the Departments and posts.
Very good idea very gareat
very good idea of retirement of 58/33 this will reduce the employment problem because there is a great problem of unemployment
The proposal with regard to revision of retirement age as 60 years or 33 years of service is not good.
Retirement Age of Central Government Employees is NOT GOOD. It will be effect to . middle family persons.
The proposal with regard to revision of retirement age as 60 years or 33 years of service , whichever is earlier is an acceptable one and must be welcomed by all the employees. This would solve the unemployment problem of the emerging talented ,well educated , qualified ,dynamic and energetic youths upto some extent . They will surely replace the old and exhausted lot of employees and contribute in progress of the country and will bring a check in unsocial acts and crimes as the youths would be engaged in some useful jobs . If one talks about the loan EMI’s and Education loans of their children its completely baseless as for if a person serves for 33 years he or she must have well settled by this time and might have repaid most of the loans , and I think this is the plight of only a few employees. While taking the final decision the government must see the interest of the mass and the same can be implemented in stages too i.e by giving grace period of at least 12 months for all the employees e.g if one attains 33 years of service on Jan 31st , 2016 then after one years grace he should retire on Jan 31st 2017 and so on. Indirectly year of service been made 34 years and can be limited for next five years or whatever decided by the Government. Thanks
Retirement age should be 60 years old in age or completion of 33 years of service which ever is earlier for each employee what ever in each and all cases, base on numbers of years of qualifying Service in case of Employees whose appointment is under Bread Winner quota or Physically handicapped quota due to sudden death of his/her only earning member of his family who died much before the date of retirement at an immature age just like 8 or 9 years before or even more.
The candidate have to look after their dependent family members and also under-aged dependent brother or sister.. Now too much highly educated young generation could handle the office work smoothly and better than the older employees. It can check the unwanted law and order situation being happening in every day in all over INDIA.Government should encourage the 7th PAY COMMISSION to envisage the criteria to give Retirement in 60 years age or completion of 33 years of service to allow the young generation to entry in government work and to be competent in between these 2 years. Government will get more support from the above employees and reservation quota may be revised in financial condition rather than cast factor. JOY JAGANNATH.
Hence Govt. should remain fixed the age of retirement 60 years of age or 33 years of service which ever is earlier for all the Central Govt. employees, it should not be increases to 62 years of Service. as because it will smash the family members of the new generation, JOY JAGANNATH.
Revision of retirement age can b a good step to fight unemployment but there should b a provision for payment of appropriate salary for the balance years.
It is shocking to hear that it is proposed to change the retirement age of Central Govt employees to 33yrs of service or 60yrs which ever is earlier.That means an employee has to retire 7 to 8 yrs earlier than his retirement age of 60 yrs.,how he will pay the EMI of housing loan,education of the children then beg,borrow and steal leading to same plight of the Indian farmers.Oh GOD give them wisdom.
How a staff aged 53yrs can retire just because he/she has joined the service immediately after graduation at the age of 20 yrs on the plea that he/she has put in 33yrs of service.There are responsibilities at this age like recovery of housing loan which goes up to the age of 58 yrs,child’s education especially if the child is in a professional course like medicine ,old parents,etc. It is a shock that how a single earning member can retire and sit at home when his children are still studying .It is unfortunate that all these aspects were not considered by competent authority.
Govt. should think about their employees. Not they just do harm for all the early appointed CG Employees who appoint at just the age of 18 or 19 years. Number of years of Service should not be taken into account, as because if any employee appoints at just the age of 18 or 19 years, then he or she have to retire at just 51 or 52 years, which IS VERY VERY BAD decision…. Because this is the crucial time for any employee… at that time he or she is under many Debts like Education loan or House Building loans etc. and also some family liabilities and also have to look after their dependent hospitalized parents.
Hence Govt. should think about all the CG employees.
Retirement age should not be lowered based on numbers of years of qualifying Service in case of Employees whose appointment is under Bread Winner quota or Physically handicapped quota due to sudden death of his/her only earning member of his family who died much before the date of retirement at an immature age just like 8 or 9 years before or even more.
The candidate have to look after their dependent family members and also under-aged dependent brother or sister.
Hence Govt. should remain fixed the age of retirement same for all the Central Govt. employees, it should not be upon the number of years of Service. as because it will smash the family members of the Employees, if the employee has to retire earlier before the retirement age.
Retirement age SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED OR REDUCED based on the number of years of Service.
It will be a VERY BAD DECISION…. It should never be done… as because early appointment in any Department should not be any DISQUALIFICATION for the said employee.
Retirement age should remain fixed for all the Central Govt. employees and it should be noway reduced to minimum 58 years from 60 years of age.
RETIREMENT AGE SHOULD BE SAME FOR ALL THE EMPLOYEES. and it should be fixed at the time of appointment not after doing certain years of service.
if we think positively age of the retirement is 58 and service is 30 years for all the employees is sufficient because now a days the lifespan is reduced .many are doesn’t have life after their retirement every one has to obey that the agreement made by them to the employer, govt cannot expect more work from them..if the employees doesn’t t plan their lives shows that they are irresponsible. in the saturation stage they cannot do any thing to the employer. simply they are dead stock. leave the less number opinion.. so many are happy that we does a good job. unemployed also will happy that they will get job . this is not an hard decision
Sir Kinsley please start the old cms penssion along with 1972 ccs and at the time of retirement before TWO YEAR GIVE PROMOTIONAL SCALE TO EMPLOYEE & ASK HIM WHICH PLACE YOU REAUIRED HOME SHOULD BE PROVIEDE BY THE GOVT TILL DEATH & CASH LESS MEFOCAL FACILITIESFACILITIES CGHS FACILITY TO TILL DEATH IS GOOD THING MAY CE CONSIDEREDCONSIDERED RETIREMENT AGE 55 YR
S.K PANDEY @ FACEBOOK CGHS 7THCPC 33 7TH
Seriously!!! Those who are in the HARD job or feel so can take voluntary retirement. That does not ordain the rest of the employees or more so, those who are, even in those posts, willing to work to retire as early as 53. Enjoyment may be part of life but not the goal of life. Is that the kind of standard we want to set for our younger generations? The goal of life should be to work, and work hard for the betterment of the country and for our coming generations.
Hoping the 7th CPC will take the step in the right direction.
Retirement age of 60/33 is very good plan many of the employees in hard jobs like pilots in railways and train controllers.officers and office staff only can enjoy the present retirement age
The proposal for retirement age of central govt employee at the service /age of 33/60 whichever is earlier is good step and beneficial for youth generation to get employment and give strength to advanced IT technology. It should be implement at central/state level.
RETIREMENT AGE SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED .I F ANYONE JOINED SERVICE BY HARDWORK AND INTELLIGENCY IN AGE 21.THE GOVT WANT TO GIVE THEM GIFT OF RETIREMENT AG54YEAR.THEN THE RETIREMENT AGE OF MP andMLA age should be also strict upto 54 year. GOVT IS ENJOYING ALL OVER WORLD AND GOVT IS NOT FEELING THE BASIC PROBLEM OF EMPLOYEES AND PUBLIC.GOVT ALWAYS WITH THE CORPORATES.ALL THE MONY IS GOING IN POCKET OF COPORATES THROUGH GOVT.
When the life expectancy of man is increasing there is no need to decrease the retirement age on the pretext of employment generation. There is no point in creating unemployment among experienced class of employees. Proposition of retirement on completion of 33 years is an absurd one. Retirement of employees with variable age at superannuation will create various anomalies. Getting a job at young age will prove to be a disadvantage for the people. The govt. employees associations should oppose it tooth and nail. If the pay commission ever accommodates it the govt should be judicious enough to discard it. Implementing it would create thousands of vacancy at end of the month when it is declared. The govt. should be ready to pay their retirement benefits also it should be prepared for situation arising out of reduction of experienced and skilled work force at that time.
Plz dnt introduced ths plan. We could face lots of issues
The proposal for retirement age of central govt employee at the service /age of 33/60 whichever is earlier is good step and beneficial for youth generation to get employment and give strength to advanced IT technology. It should be implement at central/state level.
Ex Sub Major JC Joshi (Army)
THE DECISION OF RETIREMENT ON 33 OR 60 YEARS IS TOO GOOD TO BE WELCOMED BY ALL THE NATION LOVERS.
The clarity of implementation of OROP to prematured retired defense pensioners is still not clear. Request clarification and issue notification earliest.
OUR RESPECTED PRIME MINISTER SHRI NARENDRA MODI JI IS INVITING WORLDWIDE INVESTMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE NATION BUILDING BUT IN OTHER HAND SOME OFFICIALS ARE RAISING OBJECTIONS TO BE RETIRED ON 33 OR 60.YEARS WHILE THIS DECISION WILL ENCOURAGE NEW GENERATION TO BE EMPLOYED TO SERVE THE NATION WITH STRONG HANDS & LATEST TECHNOLOGY. IT IS OBJECTIONABLE ONLY FOR THOSE WHO ARE ENJOYING FULLY ON GOVERNMENT LUXURY FACILITIES BEING IN GOVT. JOB. SO THE DECISION OF RETIREMENT ON 33 OR 60 YEARS IS TOO GOOD TO BE WELCOMED BY ALL THE NATION LOVERS.
IT IS A VERY GOOD DECISION IN THE INTEREST OF THE RESPECTED NATION. IT IS OBJECTIONABLE FOR ONLY THOSE OFFICERS WHO ARE ENJOYING THERE LIFE ON THE GOVERNMENT MONEY, GOVT. VEHICLE, GOVT.ORDERLY USING FOR PERSONAL WORKS AT THERE GOVT. LUXURY RESIDENCE. THEY ARE SHOCKING TO GIVE UP THESE FACILITIES WHICH THEY CAN”T AVAIL WITHOUT GOVT. JOB. NUMBER OF THEM ARE MISUSING OF THEIR POWERS PROVIDED BY THE GOVT. BEING IN GOVT. JOB. SO THE DECISION IS TOO GOOD TO RETIRE THEM AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
60/33 rules should not be introduced.The retirement age should be 60 years.All CGS shall be happy on.the expected 7th CPC calculation.It should be granted by finmin.
Retirement age 33 years or at the age of 58 is not justified because it will provide negative effect on the employee as well as on employer also. Employer will be under burden for arranging huge finance due to immediate bulk retirement whereas employee will fail for future planning.
It is. better to retire govt.employees on D.O.B basis and not by service of 33 Years, as he can have better experience to deliver goods , one who has more service can definitely serve better.
Modi ji! It is heartly requested to feel the grief of the NPS employees who will not get the reggular pension after their retiremen and they will get very few amout to maintain their oldness. They will be helpless. Hence it is requested to kind consider on these employees to secure them in fourth seegment of the life.
Ranjan Kumar
If India is to become big BHARAT, 33 years service is enough. People who r crying about this, need to go in the SHARAN of PARAM PITA PARMATMA who will take due care of them. Let the young generation of our country take lead in running the affairs.
33 yrs service of CG is very essential for the INDIAN future generations. I am very grateful for such thinking.
one employee now getting gross salary between 2 times to 8 times if compared to new recruitee. so it is also proposed to give at least service to at least one person of his family as fresh reruittee at least compensation of loss incurred by the employees and can get mental peace
is it sin to get a job at the age of 18+ ? as my dob is may 1969, i will retire on 31-05-2029 after attaining the age of 60. but if the age as decided by 7th cpc (may be remour), then my retirement date will be on 28-02-23 i.e. before 6 years and 3 months . again my seniors who should be retired before my retirement, now will retire after my retirement. so, it is not fair. it is proposed to keep retirement age 58 instead of 60 and ignoring the duration/period of service rendered by the employees.
Dear sir
Apni ichha se retirment ki age 15 to 17 honi chahiye.
Iske do fayde hai berojgar ko rojgar aur P.Millettry me bhi naye jawan jyada bharti honge.
58 years jo chahta ho kare.par faida kya.
Desh ko majbuti dene ke liyd saina majboot ho aur iske liye anubhaw k sath taqat v jaruri hai.avi CPC out nahi hua hai pz in bato par dhyan diya jaye.
DhanywaD
The policy decision of central govt. regarding retirement after 33 years of service, no doubt it is good for the nation. To utilise – youth mass, hands and brains acquainted with modern technology & control crime,it is the best weapon in a low maintenance. Simultaneously, govt. should take care for the employees, who are retiring from service at the age less than 60 years. It is a great shock to the people, who are supposed to retire after three years and more excluding servicing 33 years. Affected employees should be given the present basic pay multiplied by remaining months of service as a compensation at the time of retirement after 33 years of service. Furthermore, the pension must be calculated basing on the retirement age of 60 years.
give retirement on 33 years services or attaing age of 60 years which is earlier is adopt by central govt .The subject matter may affected immediately from 2015.
Welcome.7th. PRC. but retirement age should be 60 unless those who retires a the age 51. he must go mad.If 33/60 is implemented that should be for new comers those who come on or after 1.1.2016.Thanks.
Retirement age may be 33/58/60 no matter by the base year should be Jan 2016.as 7th PRC comes I to force from 1.1.2016.
The age limit is 60 is enough. Meany persons are cumming in the age of 51 years who joined in age 18 years..
If an employee will join in service at a age of 19-20 it is assumed that he/she is a good and scalar student to get job in 1st. or 2nd. change. But as per 7th.pay he/she will retire early at the age of 52 years where he/she could not clear his children liabilities like study loan, marriage loan, housing loan, LIC, health insurance etc. As a result he/she will retire with a heavy financial liability which could not be possible at lower/middle category of employee. In other hand those will get job at age of 27 yrs. after a long gap of 8yrs(19-27) he/she will serve 33 yrs and get more retirement benefit though he/she may not be scalar student as a result he/she was waiting up to the age of 27yrs to get a job. Here meritorious student/employee will be harassed and insulted by the Govt. decision. Further, since most of the State PSU/Corporation/Federation will also implement this rule in their scale revision their employee also severely affected because they don’t have any pension like GOI/State Govt. as a result the employee will severely affected financially by retiring at a age of only 51-52. And that employee will never get any job at a later stage of 51-52 yrs to maintain his family expenditure. Hence, the 7th.pay commission/Govt. of India should think over several times on this retirement age discrepancy of 33 years before finalisation of 7h.pay report. ………….God will bless the member of 7th. pay commission……………
Even if more people retire due to decrease in retirement age, the created vacancies will not be filled by younger people.But the employees who have done some planning as per expected scheduled retirement will loose a lot. So such decision is not fair.
I am not sure about the proposal of 60/33. I don’t think government will take such a step to send out to those who took long term loans.What they will do .In such case govt should help the employees to retire education loan/housing loan which they took.Hope our progressive govt of Modiji will let out his employees in such a manner…Let us hope for the best..
Even if more people retire due to decrease in retirement age, the created vacancies will not be filled by younger people.But the employees who have done some planning as per expected scheduled retirement will loose a lot.
Respected PM of India and All 7CPC members If a person retire accordin to 33/60 rule at 52 to 58 can he/she wait till 60yr for senior citizen….
It will be curse for those brilliant guys who qualified any exam at first attempt after attaining minimum age limit. Govt should consider their problems of family responsibilities. Perhaps age limit loweing will be justified for all which can be 58 years. Retirement age for university teachers should also be lowered upto 60 years.
Sir,
I heard regarding the retirement age will be 60 / 33. But unfortunately we in our position we have taken long term loan for the higher education and home also.
How will be paid the remaining loan and it is also difficult to expenditure for the daily needs in the home and other expenditure.
Kindly justify the situation.
Thanks
I got a job recently in govt sec and very well aware about problems of young generation . The retirement age should be 50 or 55 so the young India also get opportunities .
SIR,
33 Years is enough peperiod for Government jo is very effective to give retirement on 33 years service or attaining age of 60 years which is earlier. it will help to get younger generation to get job and use new technology in India. 33 years service is good enough to each central government servant.
thanks.
33 Years is enough peperiod for Government job.
Respected to All 7th C…P.C. Team.
SIR,
I am thankful to all 7th CPC Team for Preparation of “C.P.C. REPORT”.
Sir, I think 33 years of Government Service period is enough “Service Period” for good performance of Duty for all the Central / State Government officials. After implementation of 33 years policy, a New Talented Generation got Job and do well with energetic power with minimum Salory. It will benificial for Government of India.
Retirement age 33 years of service or attaining the age of 60 years whichever is earlier is not fair for the govt. servant. Every govt. servant has many plans for their life as well as their family. Present age of superannuation is 60 years. If new criteria of retirement age implements for retirement, it should not only be implemented to govt. employees but also to all the categories those who are directly involve with public service (e..g. Present central cabinet Ministers , state ministers , MPs, Governor , Chairman in diff. deptt., Judges etc. etc.). If you verify the age of present cabinet ministers, you will find that many of them are over 60 years of age. Even present prime minister, finance minister, home minister are over 60 years of age..
If present prime minister, finance minister, home minister will take retire first. than CG employee will take retirement because ministers involve govt. work.why ministers will not retirement age 52 years.
Sir,
THE RECOMMENDATION OF 60/33 WHICH EVER IS EARLIER, MAKES CG EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILIES TO COME ON THE ROADS AND BECOMES BEGGARS.BECAUSE CG EMPLOYEES HAS PLANNED THEIR LIFE STYLE. CG EMPLOYEES HAS KNOWN THEY WILL RETIRE 60 YEARS.
Some people will suicide due to CG EMPLOYEE HAS TAKEN LOANS SUCH AS HOUSE BUILDING,PERSONNEL LOANS, EDUCATION LOANS FOR THEIR CHILDRENS, If this type of case will be held, Ministers will responsible for suicide case.
LIC PREMIUMS, HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO HIS RETIREMENT AGE AS 60 YRS,
If this rule is possible, First MLA & MP take retirement age of below 52 years. than CG employee will retirement. MLA & MP will not stand politics below age 52. Every time Minister think, how he will work more days but he has not think about govt. servant.
THIS IS BAD THINK. I REQUEST YOU PLEASE DONOT STEP.
It is submitted that retirement age of service should be 58 years age or 33 years service which ever is less may please be cosidered accordingly.So no body will loose there precious svc period,and younger would also get job.Plesase
Who has joined the service between the age of 22-25 at persent they are full of energy and experience & they are able to work properly .Those person has joined in very poor scale at persent the scale is very attractive so they will be hopeless and passimist. Therefore it should not be implemented.
Thanks
Retirement age 33 years of service or attaining the age of 60 years whichever is earlier is not fair for the govt. servant. Every govt. servant has many plans for their life as well as their family. Present age of superannuation is 60 years. If new criteria of retirement age implements for retirement, it should not only be implemented to govt. employees but also to all the categories those who are directly involve with public service (e..g. Present central cabinet Ministers , state ministers , MPs, Governor , Chairman in diff. deptt., Judges etc. etc.). If you verify the age of present cabinet ministers, you will find that many of them are over 60 years of age. Even present prime minister, finance minister, home minister are over 60 years of age..
it is very effective to give retirement on 33 years service or attaining age of 60 years which is earlier.I am suggesting 58 years, it will helps to get younger generation to get job and use new technology in India. 33 years service is good enough.
It is not a good decision to restrict the retirement to 33 yrs of service as most of new employess i.e officers and staffs are on NPS ( new pension scheme) and we have no details clarification or clear cut idea of retiring pension. As per NPS rule on superannuation at least 40% of tire 1 is to be spent on buying pension plan.. Forcing to retire earlier would render after retirement life of those low paid employees ( which are in majority) in misery as there will be less accumulation in tire 1 , they will be unable to overcome their major responsibilities such as daughter’s marrage, higher education for their child, re- payment of lone , etc. We group A officers usually get better promotion every 3 yrs, better pay scale and most of us usually retire at least from SAG grade and above in better pay band but we should also think about Group C and D staffs .
Those who are thinking that reducing age of service of CG employees will bloom into thousands of vacancies , they are in dream. Almost thousands of vacancies have been and are being surrendered in Departments. This will not lead to 3000! Vacancies in Civil service or 30000! Vacancies in SSC ( who opt for it) , if you are dreaming so then wake up!
At last , in my opinion benifit of service in r/o gratuity , leave encashment, etc may be restricted to 33 yr of service, if it is necessary… But for pension purpose it should be till 60 yrs age and every employees should be allowed to continue service till 60 yrs of age.
Hope for best !!
it is very effective to give retirement on 33 years service. 33 years service is good enough to each central government servant .it is help full younger generation to get job
Dharmesh chand jain DRM OFFICE KOTA
33 YRS OF SERVICE AND THEN JOBLESS ??? IS THIS GOVERNMENT “KARMCHARI BIRODHI” ??? THIS WILL MAKE CG EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILIES TO COME ON THE ROADS. IS THIS “ACCHE DIN” FOR US ???
I join the department on Sept.1987 at the age of 19 years 6 months on the basis of of matriculation. I have completed 28 years of service. My date of birth is 10.03.1968. If it implements 33/62, the retirement age comes at the age of 52 years. This will effect my life.
Retirement age is correct for 60 this is because all gov employ have debt from bank aur wah chukta karta apni naukri se sarkar ko yah bahur soch samajhkar karna chahiye issse bahut bura phark padega desh par abhi berojgari kam hi 50sal ke log bhi naukri dhudne lage so more more think about this
India suffers from increase of population, to prevent it Govt. needs to set up a strict plan to educate all children of India upto graduate level. Retirement in 33 years of Govt. service is justified. Considering the large unemployment of the country, Retirement age 58, 60 and 62 is not considerable.
f the recommendation regarding criteria for retirement is true, it is nothing but shocking!! It will play havoc with the lives of not only of employees but also their dependent family members.All the govt. employees begin plans for their post-retirement life around 50 years of age. Around the age when this recommendation will force majority of employees to retire, the Govt. employees may have liabilities like children aspiring for higher education, daughters to be married, EMIs to be paid for home loan, etc. With this recommendation all such plans of an employees will go for a six and bring the employees on the road.Employees who joined the service at a young age, say 20-25 years will be forced to retire between 53-58 years of age. Majority of employees join service by 25 years of age. This recommendation will effectively fix the retirement age at a maximum of 58 years for a majority and 53, 54……57 for those who joined the service at younger age than 25 years.As this recommendation is surely going to bring majority of Govt. employees to a desperate and helpless situation adversely affecting their dependent family members and their own post-retirement lives, the 7th Pay Commission should not make this recommendation. If at all this recommendation is made, the Govt. is humbly requested to reject it outrightly, considering the hardships it will force on majority of its employees.
It is very effective to give retirement on 33 years service or attaining age of 60 years which is earlier. it will help to get younger generation to get job and 33 years service is good enough to each central government servant.
60 or 33 very injustis 58 is good
Retirement age is 60 yrs correct now irrespective of length of service .33 yrs is not correct as most of employees has plan as per 60 yrs retirement age.taken house loan,educational loan, children marriage plan made.if pay commission approved Retirement age 58 or 33 yrs service that is also harmful to all who are going to retire in 2017. If govt want employment for young generation idea is good create new employment. Should not disturb life of employees who will retire at the age of 60 yrs.33:yrs length of service option should not be considered.
To give employment facility to youngers 33/66 retirement age should be welcome.
early retirement will give employment to young generation. however their is change to think about re-employment if some one has not completed sixty years of age and is being retired at the age of 51 or 52. Before changing the rule the provision should be made that these retirees will be hired on contractual basis so that monthly pension plus contractual basis salary till the age do not affect much more on their monthly income expectation. officials sitting at higher level post and economist should work out details before taking final step on such major issue
Retirement at 33 years of sevice or 60 yrs age. if government fulfil that post by a recruited person panel on the next day, it is an excellent proposal. if not so, it isso worse. every body should must oppose these like proposals..It is good for no one.
If someone had to join in because of family problems at the age of 18 then they will be forced to retire 9 years before they should.
At that time his/her children may not have completed their studies and if their parent retires their pension will not be enough to pay for college or school.
1. Retired personnel must not be given chance on any contractual service. By this, unemployment is increasing day by day & disconten ment among the unemployed youths is culminating in the barrel day by day. It must be checked just now before burst .
2. Minimum 5 nos of unemployed youths can be accommodated (on contractual) in liew of a senior Govt servent salry. So retirement /Service period should be fixed to 58/33 .
58/33 ( Which ever is earlier)Years of service for an individual is justified. It would create ample employment opportunities for the unemployed. The more the age of retirement or the more years of service creates disguise unemployment because normally the old rats/ elephants do not work up to the expectation in comparison to their salary.
If the total vacancies will be fill up immediately by way of new recruitment of the freshers , the date of retirement 60/33 is most welcome.
The retirement age of 60 may be reduced to 58 years which will acceptable also to govt employee.
No doubt it is a welcoming feature for juniors to get immediate promotions and seniors of 33 years of service to go on roads.
The so called recommendation of 33 years of service or 60 years whichever happens earlier is a best one as I feel this will pave way for opening job opportunities for the unemployed youths. It is found in the govt offices that most of the officials after 50 years of age are not capable of delivering any goods to the Govt as many are patients and with multifarious problems from family side, so they normally engaged with their own problems. Leave this aspect aside, it happens with every body. The very important and significant fact is that the retirees, most of them , if the speculated recommendation is accepted and implemented, would be below 55 years of age particularly who have joined the service in Para Military Forces/Delhi Police/CISF at the age of 18-20 as Constable/Direct HC, They, after retirement, should report to their respective State Govts which should utilise their services to strengthen the State Police in maintaining Law and order of the State. Their services can also be utilised in the case of national emergency, national calamity like flood, earth quake etc.etc. They should be paid some compensation, in addition to their pension, out of the state’s fund. This will also facilitate to enrol lot many youngsters in their place and to keep the fighting force ( CPMFs) physically fit. Normally, any soldier after 50 years of age are not capable enough to perform their duties effectively and efficiently vis-a-vis the youngsters. As we know the retirees cannot go for any anti national activities, whereas the youngsters if they are unemployed can go astray, which is very dangerous for the nation. India should keep its fighting force young, energetic. We should seriously think about it, rather than thinking of individual benefits. Utmost priority and importance should be given to the nation’s security.
Plse approved properly EX-CAPF reservation all over india and voluntary retirement service less than 20 yrs, CG employees are re settled in home town.
should be optional 58 years of age Or 33/60 years.
Sir, as the retirement age of CPO and MCPO in NAVY is increased upto 52 and 57 years and. Also in AIRFORCE the retirement age is upto 57 years. Hence, the retirement age of JCOs in ARMY specially in para medical forces should also be increased from 52 years to 57 years so that he can settle his family properly
I think only those who are competent enough & get a chance get employed at early stage. Retiring them at 33 means retiring the best men from a department.
Retirement age remains a controversy before every pay commission. The idea of retiring an employee at the age of 60 years or after completion of 33 years of service which ever is earlier is perhaps not proper. The superannuation age is determined with reference to life expectancy and not with reference to length of service. Before enforcing any change it is mandatory to tune up the mind set and this may be implemented only in respect of those employees who are joining central govt service after implementation of the 7th pay commission recommendations. In this connection I would like to invite the attention of all regarding the introduction of NPS (New Pension scheme) which has been put in to force from those employees who joined after 10/2004. Same parameter may be followed in respect of retirement element. Since the existing employees might have worked out their commitments viz children education, marriage, house construction etc based on the present superannuation age of 60 years and any reduction might disturb their planning – regards
It is a very brilliant idea for growth of nation. 33 years are quite enough . In this way our young generation having more new talent will be able to join and work with more efficiency and energy. It is good for all – for nation, for old generation and for young generation.
Those who joined at the age of just 18 or 19 years due to Medically Unfitness of his/her parents under the medical ground or due to sudden demise of only earning member of his/ her family due to bread winner quota. The said employee have to look after their medically unfit parents for their medical treatment and also after the dependent younger under-aged family members(dependent brother or sisters) of his/her family. But if the said employee has to forcibly retire at the age of just 51 years or 52 years after completing 33 years, it is punishing for the said employee at the age of 51 or 52 years. At that time the employee have no other way to earn his/her bread and he/she have no other way to look after their child future or family. Also the employee who covered under New Pension Scheme (NPS) of the Govt. , will also suffer the same problem very acutely if they have to forcefully retire at the age of just 51 or 52 years. The Govt should consider Medically Unfit ground or Bread Winner Cases also and for those covered under New Pension Scheme whose appointment is after the year of 2004.
it will become a disaster to us who joined at early age and our children are not settled. anticipating some more years of service, we have taken loans such as personal, education etc. which will be difficult to repay if we are asked to go. we expected Modi govt to do something good for govt employees but if retirement age is reduced to 33 years , it will be a cheating for us.
Sir,
Some people are making comments, early retirement of 33 years completion of service will help to the younger generation to get the jobs. It is absolutely a wrong statement, as on date many people are retired, whether all the posts are filled with younger generation? At present many vacancies are available in various departments, why they are not filling? Filling of the posts will be as per the goverenmenty policy. The recomendation of retirement age on completion of number of years service should not be a correct criteria.
Sir,
if somebody is retiring between Jan to June on completion of six months and more service, he may be given one increatment as is given on promotion, so that no retiree is deprived from the benefits. It would be a kind of incentive to the pers who at the time of retirement need such benefits to compensate himself.
May I requested to mamber of 7PC please 33/58 age are good for retirement. so please you consider that and New generation get employment in gov’t office.
The 60/33 rule for retirement proposal would be deadly, dangerous and fatal to all the employees who generally joined their jobs at very early age, say about 18 to 20 years of age, due to their family and financial problems. Generally many candidates with very good academic background and even many top rankers of the state joined their jobs on merit at very early age as they were all from very economically weaker sections of society in olden days. And most of their earnings being small and very much not even adequate to take care of their family problems and parents and other family members like brothers or sisters education or their welfare. They would be hardly making their earnings to stabilize their family problems. And rest of their period they hardly can make enough earning to save for their secured future as most of their salaries are only hand to mouth survival. Hence, Government can not accept this kind of cruel and meaningless 60/33 proposal to retire all the early joined employees..
Generally these rules are proposed or made by only a few of top bureaucrats or very high officials of the Government for their self benefit, as they are not affected by these rules as they would have normally joined at an age of around 27 to 30 years. For these officials there is no retirement even after their superannuation as they would be somewhere engaged by the Government in some high level committees. Also these officials who made late entry in to higher grades of Govt jobs, due to their family support, would have certainly amassed huge amounts of savings due to higher grades of pay scales or by other means…!!
Only Govt employees who made very early entry in to their jobs at early age due to their family and financial problems will be the worst sufferers and affected by this 60/33 retirement age rule. Also this kind of rule affects the morality and spirit of competitiveness among the youth for selection of Govt jobs, as every person who makes their early entry into Govt job due to their financial problems, whoever it is, needs to be in their Government service atleast up to the completion of their 60 years of age.
So it is for our Government to think and rethink not to consider this kind of cruel and headless 60/33 years of retirement proposal made by some rogue members. Hope our Government would do the justice.
Sharat Kumar Das correctly said, retiring at the age of 33 will fatal for those who join CG service at the early age and will be forced to retire at 51 or so . most of the responsibilities are pending like children education or making a house. 7th CPC should rethink if the news is correct.
Good move of the 7th Pay Commission of decreasing Retirement age. We should welcome it so that young should get opportunity.
It is very good step if happened. Let the younger generation will accomodate in a new era. .Ofcource It will a creat a goog and balancing soceity where no criminal activities,neusance etc created..
THE RECOMMENDATION OF 60/33 WHICH EVER IS EARLIER, MAKES CG EMPLOYEES AND THEIR FAMILIES TO COME ON THE ROADS AND BECOMES BEGGARS BECAUSE OF 7TH PAY COMMISSION”S COMMITTEE MEMBERS, THE SIN ON THIS ACCOUNT WILL GOES TO COMMITTEE MEMBERS/// IT IS NOT JUSTIFIED THE COMMITTEE NOT TAKEN PRACTICAL THEY BLINDLY TAKEN SOME BODIES INSTRUCTIONS THE 99% OF CG EMPLOYEE HAS TAKEN LOANS SUCH AS HOUSE BUILDING,PERSONNEL LOANS, EDUCATION LOANS FOR THEIR CHILDRENS, LIC PREMIUMS, HEALTH INSURANCE POLICIES WITH RESPECT TO HIS RETIREMENT AGE AS 60 YRS, IN CASE IF IT IS REDUCED THESE ALL CG EMPLOYEES INCLUDING THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS COMES ON THE ROADS AND STARTS BEGGING// WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS .. ONLY THE COMMITTEE OF 7TH PAY COMMISSION.
The 60/33 rule will be fatal for those who enters CG service at the age of 18 . They will retire at 51 . Till then their children are at the age below 18 and not capable of earning. The person will be mad at this state . This shouldn’t be implemented .
At the time,when the last age of joining C.Govt Job was 25 yrs.so the 60/33 formula may please be cosidered accordongly.So no body will loose there precious svc period,and younger would also get job..
it is very effective to give retirement on 33 years service or attaining age of 60 years which is earlier. it will help to get younger generation to get job and use new technology in India. 33 years service is good enough to each central government servant.
thanks
how any body retires without increments even after serving 12 months? This can happen to every one who retires on 30th June!!!