7th CPC Increment : Recommendations on Annual and Promotional Increment
7th CPC Increment : The 7th Pay Commission has recommended on the rate of annual increment is being retained at 3 percent.
Illustrative Examples in Respect of annual increment…
Withholding Annual Increments of Non-performers after 20 Years : There is a widespread perception that increments as well as upward movement in the hierarchy happen as a matter of course. The perception is that grant of MACP, although subject to the employee attaining the laid down threshold of performance, is taken for granted. This Commission believes that employees who do not meet the laid down performance criterion should not be allowed to earn future annual increments. The Commission is therefore proposing withholding of annual increments in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.
This will act as a deterrent for complacent and inefficient employees. However, since this is not a penalty, the norms for penal action in disciplinary cases involving withholding increments will not be applicable in such cases. This will be treated as an “efficiency bar”. Additionally, for such employees there could be an option to leave service on similar terms and conditions as prescribed for voluntary retirement.
Grant of First Annual Increment in Recruits Pay : The main demand of the Services in this connection is that the existing stipulation that next increment will be granted from the date of attestation or mustering be done away with. They have pointed out that trades whose skill requirements are low and whose entry level qualifications are lower invariably get attested or mustered earlier and thus are entitled to the next annual increment earlier than trades whose training period is longer.
Analysis and Recommendations : The Commission is of the view that grant of next increment in the case of recruits should not place those with higher entry level qualifications at a disadvantage. The Commission, accordingly recommends that the date of enrolment should be reckoned for the purposes of first increment for all recruits who are finally successfully attested/mustered.
Non implantation of map promotion whether cr not delivered to employee continuous 3 yrs. What can I do. Bhatt
what is govt dont want to know the root cause instead of thinking about the backward and unpreviliges employees who need upliftment instead of downgrading them? when same personnel are in same rank are recruited from different angles that is GEN. OBC. SC.. ST backward class . this cpc indirectly want to abolish quota by implementing MACP in govt servant…by saying sopka sat sopka vikas…. bcoz it will leave unfaithful to all backward govt employees which will lack their benchmark for MACP and Annual increment … please rectify for all citizens……
what is govt thinking about the unpreviliges employees who need upliftment instead of downgrading them? when same personnel are in same rank are recruited from different angles that is GEN. OBC. SC.. ST backward class . this cpc indirectly want to abolish quota by implementing MACP in govt servant…by saying sopka sat sopka vikas…. bcoz it will leave unfaithful to all backward govt employees which will lack their benchmark for MACP and Annual increment … please rectify for all citizens……
Its really strange that 7th CPC has stated that annual increment will be 3% ? Is it so? See the examples below:
1. Level 1 = 18000 x 3 = 540 = 180540 but it is 18500
2. Level 7 = 44900 x 3 = 1347 = 46247 but it is 46200
3. Level 8 = 47600 x 3 = 1428 = 49028 but it is 49000
4. Level 11 = 66700 x 3 = 2031 = 69731 but it is 69700
5. Level 13A = 131100 x 3 = 3933 = 135033 but it is 135000
6. Level 14 = 144200 x 3 = 4326 = 148526 but it is 148500
This is at the Index no. 2 and even on alternate index levels less than 3% increment has been added.
This is really not good.