FLASH NEWS ON ‘ONE RANK ONE PENSION’ – OROP FILE HAS BEEN CLEARED BY FINMIN AND IS NOW WITH PM
06 Apr 2015
Dear Veterans,
Jai Hind.
The OROP file has been cleared by Ministry of Finance and is now with PM.
There is NO DILUTION of the Definition of OROP as announced twice in the Lok Sabha.
However, the X and Y Group pensions, of JCOs and OR will be different, as always, and not same as expected by some Veterans.
Source: http://ex-servicemenwelfare.blogspot.in/
Where is the official table elaborating the fixation of OROP payment. When it comes in Black and White only, any comments on the fixation is worthy.As always the Group system should be maintained, otherwise it will be an injustice to Technical personnel who works in the hot sun for maintaining the machine in flight worthy condition. Hope that PCDA will publish the OROP payment table at an early date.
When x &y group are maintained :how orop is successful in its objectives.The main purpose of orop was to kill the differences between groups
Sir
Once variation in pension of X and Y group then what is the meaning of OROP . After requirement all are Ex man let it any group. please clarified’
Dear Sir, Why such differences between ranks, when the identity is distinguished with rank to which you or one is retired. Neither one is the effective worker after retirement. Please don’t create and demark line between ex-servicemen. I wish we brethens shall unite to keep the bread which comes in hand, Jai Hind.
How does the x and y group matters for Ex Indian Naval Pensioners? Particularly for Ex Chief Artificer cadre? Some one , pl clarify
KYON MITHI GOLI DE RAHE HO.
Sir, OROP news appears to be sweet and encouraging.This will be double sweet for Officers, and JCOs promoted on the 11th year of service.Sgt and below with minimum service of 15 years , I hope would be less advantaged.
2. The pension must match with to lead a life of dignity, and sense of pride for having joined the armed forces, & to meet the ever-growing inflation and social needs and heath needs
Dear sir,
There is a hidden cavity in the statement wherein X and Y group in the case of JCOs/OR. nobody wants to demystify the encrypted version. whether it is in consistent with laid down definition of OROP, whether any deviation or modification, what I perceive OR will not be given due entitlements. they wish to rob peter to pay paul