7th Pay Commission Salary Calculator January 2025 (55% DA Updated)
January 2025 DA Calculator (55% Confirmed!)7th CPC Ready Reckoner Pension Tables – Fitment Table-14
7th CPC Ready Reckoner and Notional Pay Pension Table for Pre-2016 Pensioners
Table No.14 : Pay Scale Details
4th CPC: 2375-75-3200-100-3500, 2375-75-3200-100-35
5th CPC: 74500-225-11500
6th CPC: PB-2 GP4600
7th CPC: Matrix Level-7
7th CPC Ready Reckoner Pension Tables – Fitment Table-14
| 4th CPC | 5th CPC | 6th CPC |
| 2375 | 7450 | 18460 |
| 2450 | 7450 | 18460 |
| 2525 | 7675 | 18880 |
| 2600 | 7900 | 19300 |
| 2675 | 8125 | 19720 |
| 2750 | 8350 | 20140 |
| 2825 | 8575 | 20550 |
| 2900 | 8800 | 20970 |
| 2975 | 9025 | 21390 |
| 3050 | 9250 | 21810 |
| 3125 | 9475 | 22230 |
| 3200 | 9700 | 22650 |
| 3300 | 10150 | 23480 |
| 3400 | 10375 | 23900 |
| 3500 | 10600 | 24320 |
| *3600 | 10825 | 24740 |
| 3625 | 10825 | 24740 |
| *3700 | 11050 | 25160 |
| 3750 | 11050 | 25160 |
| *3875 | 11275 | 25580 |
| *4000 | 11500 | 25990 |
| *11725 | 26410 | |
| *11950 | 26830 | |
| *12175 | 27250 |
| 7th CPC | Pension | F.Pension |
| 47600 | 23800 | 14280 |
| 47600 | 23800 | 14280 |
| 49000 | 24500 | 14700 |
| 50500 | 25250 | 15150 |
| 52000 | 26000 | 15600 |
| 52000 | 26000 | 15600 |
| 53600 | 26800 | 16080 |
| 55200 | 27600 | 16560 |
| 55200 | 27600 | 16560 |
| 56900 | 28450 | 17070 |
| 58600 | 29300 | 17580 |
| 58600 | 29300 | 17580 |
| 60400 | 30200 | 18120 |
| 62200 | 31100 | 18660 |
| 64100 | 32050 | 19230 |
| 64100 | 32050 | 19230 |
| 64100 | 32050 | 19230 |
| 66000 | 33000 | 19800 |
| 66000 | 33000 | 19800 |
| 66000 | 33000 | 19800 |
| 68000 | 34000 | 20400 |
| 68000 | 34000 | 20400 |
| 70000 | 35000 | 21000 |
| 72100 | 36050 | 21630 |
Modified parity is boon for juniors and suicidel for seniors. Rejection of option one has made the seniors to suffer life long. This is great injustice
It looks fifth commission did not compensate from point to point basis hence it is not equitable to pensioners who came from fourth pay commission
Hence the 7th pay commission recommendation for number of increments corresponding to number of years is denied.
This is discriminatory
A T Patil..