Central Government Employees Latest News

8th Pay Commission Latest News Today, Pay Matrix, Expected DA Rates Table

You are here: Home / DOPT / Recovery of wrongful and excess payments made to Government servants – Dopt orders on 2.3.2016
7th Pay Commission Salary Calculator January 2025 (55% DA Updated)
January 2025 DA Calculator (55% Confirmed!)
New Rates of House Rent Allowance (Updated 2025)
New Rates of Transport Allowance (Updated 2025)
Central Government First Pay Calculator 2025

Recovery of wrongful and excess payments made to Government servants – Dopt orders on 2.3.2016

March 2, 2016 admin Leave a Comment

Recovery of wrongful and excess payments made to Government servants – Dopt orders on 2.3.2016

F.No.18/03/2015-Estt. (Pay-I)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training

New Delhi, the 2nd March, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub: Recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM No.18/26/2011-Estt (Pay-I) dated 6th February, 2014 wherein certain instructions have been issued to deal with the issue of recovery of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants in view of the law declared by Courts, particularly, in the case of Chandi Prasad Uniyal And Ors. vs. State of Uttarakhand And Ors., 2012 AIR SCW 4742, (2012) 8 SCC 417. Para 3(iv) of the OM inter-alia provides that recovery should be made in all cases of overpayment barring few exceptions of extreme hardships.

2. The issue has subsequently come up for consideration before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc in CA No.11527 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.11684 of 2012) wherein Hon’ble Court on 18.12.2014 decided a bunch of cases in which monetary benefits were given to employees in excess of their entitlement due to unintentional mistakes committed by the concerned competent authorities, in determining the emoluments payable to them, and the employees were not guilty of furnishing any incorrect information / misrepresentation / fraud, which had led the concerned competent authorities to commit the mistake of making the higher payment to the employees.

The employees were as innocent as their employers in the wrongful determination of their inflated emoluments. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment dated 18 th December, 2014 ibid has, inter-alia, observed as under:

“7. Having examined a number of judgments rendered by this Court, we are of the view, that orders passed by the employer seeking recovery of monetary benefits wrongly extended to employees, can only be interfered with, in cases where such recovery would result in a hardship of a nature, which would far outweigh, the equitable balance of the employer’s right to recover.

In other words, interference would be called for, only in such cases where, it would be iniquitous to recover the payment made. In order to ascertain the parameters of the above consideration, and the test to be applied, reference needs to be made to situations when this Court exempted employees from such recovery, even in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.

Repeated exercise of such power, “for doing complete justice in any cause” would establish that the recovery being effected was iniquitous, and therefore, arbitrary. And accordingly, the interference at the hands of this Court.”

“10. In view of the afore-stated constitutional mandate, equity and good conscience, in the matter of livelihood of the people of this country, has to be the basis of all governmental actions.

An action of the State, ordering a recovery from an employee, would be in order, so long as it is not rendered iniquitous to the extent, that the action of recovery would be more unfair, more wrongful, more improper, and more unwarranted, than the corresponding right of the employer, to recover the amount.

Or in other words, till such time as the recovery would have a harsh and arbitrary effect on the employee, it would be permissible in law. Orders passed in given situations repeatedly, even in exercise of the power vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, will disclose the parameters of the realm of an action of recovery (of an excess amount paid to an employee) which would breach the obligations of the State, to citizens of this country, and render the action arbitrary, and therefore, violative of the mandate contained in Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

3. The issue that was required to be adjudicated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court was whether all the private respondents, against whom an order-of recovery (of the excess amount) has been made, should be exempted in law, from the reimbursement of the same to the employer.

For the applicability of the instant order, and the conclusions recorded by them thereinafter, the ingredients depicted in paras 2&3 of the judgment are essentially indispensable.

4. The Hon’ble Supreme Court while observing that it is not possible to postulate all situations of hardship which would govern employees on the issue of recovery, where payments have mistakenly been made by the employer, in excess of their entitlement has summarized the following few situations, wherein recoveries by the employers would be impermissible in law:-

(i) Recovery from employees belonging to Class-III and Class-IV service (or Group ‘C’ and Group ‘D’ service).

(ii) Recovery from retired employees, or employees who are due to retire within one year, of the order of recovery.

(iii) Recovery from employees, when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of five years, before the order of recovery is issued.

(iv) Recovery in cases where an employee has wrongfully been required to discharge duties of a higher post, and has been paid accordingly, even though he should have rightfully been required to work against an inferior post.

(v) In any other case, where the Court arrives at the conclusion, that recovery if made from the employee, would be iniquitous or harsh or arbitrary to such an extent, as would far outweigh the equitable balance of the employer’s right to recover.

5. The matter has, consequently, been examined in consultation with the Department of Expenditure and the Department of Legal Affairs. The Ministries / Departments are advised to deal with the issue of wrongful / excess payments made to Government servants in accordance with above decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No.11527 of 2014 (arising out of SLP (C) No.11684 of 2012) in State of Punjab and others etc vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) etc.

However, wherever the waiver of recovery in the above-mentioned situations is considered, the same may be allowed with the express approval of Department of Expenditure in terms of this Department’s OM No.18/26/2011-Estt (Pay-I) dated 6th February, 2014.

6. In so far as persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department are concerned, these orders are issued with the concurrence of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

7. Hindi version will follow.

sd/-
(A.K.Jain)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

Source:www.persmin.gov.in

No related posts.

Filed Under: DOPT, DOPT ORDERS, Dopt Orders 2016

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Online Calculators

  • 7th Pay Commission Salary Calculator January 2025 (55% DA Updated)
  • Expected DA from July 2025 Calculator
  • Pay Scale Conversion Calculator
  • 7th CPC Increment Calculator 2025
  • KVS PGT, TGT, PRT Teacher Salary Calculator 2025
  • Bonus Calculator for CG Employees 2025
  • CGEGIS Savings Fund Benefit Calculator Updated 2025
  • Central Government First Pay Calculator 2025
  • Retirement Date Calculator for CG Employees
  • DA Arrears Calculator January 2025 (55% Updated)
  • Commutation Factor Value of Pension Calculator
  • Leave Encashment of CG Employees Calculator
  • HRA Income Tax Exemption Calculator for Salaried Employees
  • 7th CPC Pension and Arrears Calculator
  • Fixation of Pay on Promotion Calculator as per FR 22(I)(a)(1)
  • 7th CPC Pay Calculator for Teachers in Universities and Colleges
  • 18 Months DA Arrears Calculator for CG Employees
  • 18 Months DA Arrears Calculator for CG Pensioners
  • 7th CPC TA & DA Calculator
  • Government Pension Calculator 2025
  • CPSE (IDA Pay Scale) Salary Calculator
  • DA Amount Calculator Online 2024
  • Dearness Relief (DR) Calculator for Pensioners
  • Expected January 2024 IDA Calculator for BSNL Employees
  • Expected IDA Calculator from April 2024 for CPSE Employees
  • GPF Interest Rate Calculator
  • HRA Online Calculator
  • LTC Cash Voucher Scheme Calculator
  • Option Calculator for Promotion or MACP to Switch over to 7th CPC
  • OROP Arrears Calculator for Defence Pensioners
  • Simple Online New & Old Regime Income Tax Calculator

State Govt Calculators

  • Maharashtra Govt 7th Pay Commission Calculator
  • Karnataka Pension and Family Pension Calculator
  • Option for Fixation Calculator for Tamil Nadu Govt Employees
  • Pay Calculator for Jammu & Kashmir Govt Employees
  • Pay Scale Calculator for Karnataka Govt Employees
  • Rajasthan Employees Pay Matrix Calculator
  • Tamil Nadu Govt Employees Pay Calculator
  • WB 6th Pay Commission Revised Pay Calculator

Top Pages

  • Pay Matrix Table for Central Government Employees
  • 7th CPC DA Calculation Table 2016 to 2025
  • DA Rates Table 2025 | Current DA Rate 53%
  • CSD Price List 2025: Car, Bike, Scooter, AC, TV, WM and Fridge
  • Kendriya Vidyalaya Fee Structure 2025-26
  • Kendriya Vidyalaya Balvatika School Admission Form 2025-26
  • 7th CPC Briefcase Allowance 2025

8th Pay Commission News

  • Latest 8th Pay Commission News Date, Salary Slab, Pay Scale Calculator
  • Expected 8th Pay Commission Pay Matrix Table

Latest Discussions

  • Manoj Kumar on Clarification on MACP Grade Pay 4200 to 4600 Inspector Posts
  • M K KUMAR on Gratuity ceiling raised to 20 Lakhs w.e.f. 29.3.2018
  • M K KUMAR on Clarification on MACP Grade Pay 4200 to 4600 Inspector Posts
  • Meena on KV School Contractual Teachers | Consolidated Pay and Qualification for all Posts 2025-26
  • dilip yadaav on 7th CPC MACP APAR Benchmark Grading System
  • A V FERNANDEZ on 7th CPC Pay Fixation on Promotion Calculator with Matrix Table 2025
  • Harpreet Singh on Gratuity ceiling raised to 20 Lakhs w.e.f. 29.3.2018
  • Thirumalesh C on Clarification on MACP Grade Pay 4200 to 4600 Inspector Posts
  • M K KUMAR on Karnataka Pension and Family Pension Calculator
  • M K KUMAR on Karnataka Pension and Family Pension Calculator
Copyright © 2023 | Central Government Employees News | 7th Pay Commission News | Sitemap | Site maintained by TEUT Digital Concepts