OROP Anomalies – One member Judicial Committee will submit its report in six months
One member Judicial Committee has been appointed on 14.12.2015 to look into the anomalies arising out of implementation of OROP. The Judicial Committee will submit its report in six months – Defence Minister
Detailed instructions along with OROP tables on implementation of OROP have been issued on 3.2.2016. Considering the requirement for implementation of “One Rank One Pension”, the expenditure ceiling for Defence Pensions in BE 2016-2017 has been increased from Rs.69,876 crores to Rs.82,332.66 crores. Government has received representations from various Ex-Servicemen Associations and beneficiaries regarding anomalies and their dissatisfaction with the order of OROP scheme.
One member Judicial Committee has been appointed on 14.12.2015 to look into the anomalies arising out of implementation of OROP. The Judicial Committee will submit its report in six months.
The following instructions have been issued to Pension Disbursing Agencies(PDAs) for effective implementation of OROP:
• The arrears on account of revision of pension from 01.07.2014 be paid in four equal half yearly instalments. However, family pensioners including those in receipt of Special/Liberalized family pension and all Gallantry award winners shall be paid arrears in one instalment.
• Any required information, if not available in record may be referred to Pension Sanctioning Authority(PSA) concerned who will provide the requisite information from the available records within 15 days to the PDAs.
• In case of any doubt, PDA may immediately take up the matter with nodal officers of respective PSAs, the details of which shall be notified by Pr. CDA(P) Allahabad in their implementation instructions.
This information was given by Defence Minister Shri Manohar Parrikar in a written reply to Shri Devajibhai G Fatepara and others in Lok Sabha today.
Source: PIB
Majs who came from ranks and served more then thirty years including commissioned service are getting pension of twenty two years as per orop tables. Before the orop they were getting pension for twenty five years. For example, I have served thirty two years and eight months. However, my pension is equal to a maj who served for twenty two years and equal to a new commissioned maj with a service of six years
For calculation of pensio lengthof service is counted whatever one has served and his last rank. Why only for majs these rules are not followed. Hope your honour will be agree with me and we will get justice.
Thanks.
After going through the orop table No 7, it is comes out that in the various ranks length of service increasing but pension is not increasing. For example a Nk of 15 yrs service pension is Rs 7170/-pm and a Nk whose service is 20 yrs and more but pension is same equal to 15 yrs of service ie Rs 7170/-pm only. No importance of length of service is given.
Sir OROP imlemation is why so late?