7th CPC Pay Scales for PBORs of Armed Forces
7TH PAY COMMISSION DEFENCE ARMED FORCES LATEST NEWS TODAY OCT 2019
7th Pay Commission New Pay Scale of PBORs of Armed Forces
Pay Matrix Scale with MSP and X-Group Pay
Sepoy, Naik, Havildar, Nb Sub, Subedar and Sub Major
Post | Level in Matrix Table | MSP | X – Group Pay | |
TQR AICTE* | NO TQ** | |||
Sepoy | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Naik | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Havaldar | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Nb Sub | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Subedar | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Sub Major | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
*Technical Qualification Recognised by AICTE
**No Technical Qualification AIR FORCE
Pay Matrix Scale with MSP and X-Group Pay
AC/LAC, Corporal, Sergant, Jr Warrant Officer and MWO
Post | Level in Matrix Table | MSP | X – Group Pay | |
TQR AICTE* | NO TQ** | |||
AC / LAC | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Corporal | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Sergeant | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Jr Warrant Officer | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Warrant Officer | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
MWO | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
*Technical Qualification Recognised by AICTE
**No Technical Qualification NAVY (X-GROUP)
Pay Matrix Scale with MSP and X-Group Pay
Apprentice, Artificer-V, Artificer-IV, Artificer-III-I**, Chief Artificer, MCPO-II and MCPO-I
Post | Level in Matrix Table | MSP | X – Group Pay | |
TQR AICTE* | NO TQ** | |||
Apprentice | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Artificer – V | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Artificer – IV | 21700 – 57500 (Level 3 to 5) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Artificer III – I** | 33300 – 94100 (Level 5A) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
Chief Artificer |
35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
MCPO – II | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
MCPO – I | 35400 – 94100 (Level 6 to 8) | 5200 | 6200 | 3600 |
*Technical Qualification Recognised by AICTE
**No Technical Qualification NAVY (Y-GROUP)
Pay Matrix Scale with MSP
Seaman II/I, Leading Seaman, Petty Officer, Chief Petty Officer, MCPO-II and MCPO-I
Post | Level in Matrix Table | MSP |
Seaman II/ I | 21700 – 57500(Level 3 to5) | 5200 |
Leading Seaman | 21700 – 57500(Level 3 to5) | 5200 |
Petty Officer | 21700 – 57500(Level 3 to5) | 5200 |
Chief Petty Officer | 35400 – 94100(Level 6 to8) | 5200 |
MCPO – II | 35400 – 94100(Level 6 to8) | 5200 |
MCPO – I | 35400 – 94100(Level 6 to8) | 5200 |
Charles F says
As per sixth pay commission scheme one who had completed his service in same Rank Or Grade pay will be eligible for MACP scheme. But this was not done PCDA will generate MACP PPO but no change in Basic pension because Record office has not sent docu to PCDA. Pls tell What should Do.
A N Yadav says
Sir, kindly le me know soldier gtd ACP/MACP are entitled pensionery benefits of ACP/MACP rank such as a Sep gtd ACP Nk, he is entitled for NK pension.etc. Similarly, a Sub gtd ACP-1 ie MACP Sub Maj, is he entitled pension equivalent to Sub Maj or Sub only.
Raj says
Respected sir l complete my 17 years and retired as No TS so what level of mine and my grade pay was 2400
HONY CAPT HANS RAJ SHARMA says
Technical pay (‘X’ group pay) should not be withdrawn of Jco,’s who are granted honorary commission . It is noticed that JCOS of all groups ei. X, Y & Z are kept in same scale after having been granted honorary commission which is not correct.
Gmathiyalagan says
Sir I am reqst myservis20years army eme corps my tradis master chef 7paycommisionmybasicpayandtotal
Harendra singh says
Sir
Why JE (NE) Jco of( corps of signals)not come in 6200/- Technical pay scale.
Shhill says
Why only JCOs all the Armyman are same equal.. MSP means Military service pay there is no different between officers. JCOs and OR all are Military!! Why you people use Your shameless mine..
sadik says
Dear sir
jawanoka MSP kyonahi Badri.har kaam Jawan kartehai phir unko kyo Nahi MSP Badra hai
AK Rathore says
Sir,
MSP is not justified as value of life is same for all. Even it should be more for PBOR,S ,as they are more susceptible to lay their lives in comparison to any others being in defence services.
Thanks,
Sridharan says
It is only ine the statement which has never been brought into effective. Still defence retired personnel has to service with what they they get.
Jagdish says
Pl consider the MSP of JCOs at least Rs 10500/-PM being back bone of the Army.
RK Sharavat says
Mr Santosh’s point is absolutely correct government must take this into consideration.
surya says
For this act of govt more n more soldiers are getting volunteer retirement
Sanjay says
You’re saying right sir
Anil kumar says
There are three categories in army, MSP Rs 5200 is same for both ORs and JCOs, why Officers will get more. MSP should be more for JCOs. it should be atleast Rs 4000 for JCOs. MNS will also get MSP more than JCOs
Santhosh says
A reality Check on implementation of 7th Pay Commission
===================
The signals regarding 7th CPC reveals that the implementation of 7th CPC has purposefully been delayed to resolve the issues of officer’s(from Lt Col to Brig)only. Their fitments factor has been revised from 2.57 to 2.87. Officer’s parity with IAS & IPS services has also been ensured. Who will get the benefit of extension of stages from 24 to 40 for JCOs/OR? Nobody is going to get any benefit because JCOs/OR get retired well before any stagnation due to age limit applicable for us. Officers serves upto 55 yrs and PBORs of Navy & Air Force can also serve upto 55 yrs. Then why shouldn’t JCOs/OR be retained till 55 yrs of age to get maximum increments by which they will also earn good pension like their counterparts/civilians?. But to KEEP THE ARMY YOUNG AND FIT FOR WAR they bring service and age criteria to Army so that the JCOs/OR get retires at younger age to keep the physical fitness of the Army and contradictorily it is not applicable to Navy and Air Force !!! . Since the PBOR of Air force & Navy can serve upto 55 yrs why special consideration of pension benefits not being given for JCOs/OR of Army? Nobody will argue for us because there is no member from JCOs/OR
available in pay commission cell. If anybody is there, his views will not be taken into any consideration!! In the 5th CPC, the pay of Hav, SM, Maj and Maj Gen were not revised on 10 Oct 97 when others get benefited of revision..the case was taken up at appropriate level and pay of Maj & Maj Gen got revised but Hav & SM were left out. Similarly in 6th CPC also, the Lt Col’s pay was increased from 15400 to 34700(who were only left out without much pay hike) and officer’s promotion prospects has also been enhanced and they got promoted at younger age/service. Now-a-days, a CO of a unit is having only 17/18 yrs of service whereas earlier a Maj, who is leading a Coy, was having more than 20 yrs service/experience. This will bring negative impact when a war take place because the CO and other officers lacking required operational/man management experience. The officer’s promotion was delinked from promotion exams of Part B & D whereas Nb Sub still to pass JLPT to get promotion to Sub?!! Nobody is there to question such irregularities and biased policies. Now also, to keep calm the JCO’s/OR for non implementation of 7th CPC so far, the officer’s fooled them by issuing bogus letters/messages purportedly showing increased pay scales and the fitments factor of 2.87 etc for JCO’s/OR without having any authentication!!! When it is implemented now, there is no gains for JCO’s/OR..Only disability pensioners get benefited which includes the officers also. Totally, the JCO’s/OR get cheated again by their superiors as done earlier too.
Santa says
If no changes for pay scale, why too late for declare ???????????????????
Anil says
There are three cat in army ORs, JCO. and offrs but why msp is same ie 5200 for ORs and JCO although Offrs will get more
Birendra Upadhyay says
But the demand of MSP Rs. 10500 PM for JCO was not cleared, why? Was it taken with Cabinet by our chiefs? Pls let us know why was it not approved. Why MNS are authorised to draw MSP once they don’t come under Defence ministry and they neither handle weapons nor go to for such type of duties for which MSP is authorised
BG Neogi says
Thanks but when Bank credit the new pay?
Hemen Bhattacharya says
let the above scale of pay be implemented by CDAP allahabad from october 2016 then we can send some best complements to three Chiefs of Armed forces and Ministry of Defence.
dineshan p says
Dear Sgt OP Sharma,
Irrespective of you are in AirForce, Army or Navy, the protocol says, the hierarchy followed in Army is considered as a standard tool for service custom and etigates. Army follows a rank structure as JCO from Nb Sub and JCO mess entry from that rank. Fortunately/Unfortunately not standardised. If standardised, then Sgt may not be considered for SNCO Mess. Or HAV or equivalent may be considered for SNCO Mess. But in general, a trend is you may be on the losing side as Army HAV is in OR Mess. Best of Luck
sanjay says
Sir, why the MSP can not be done equally between PBOR, MNS & OFFICERS.
Is OFFICERS/MNS doing high grade military duty or the PBOR doing the low grade military duty??
Why it’s difference sir ???
Plz rply sir after discussion.
JP Sharma says
As long as officers are representing JCO/ORS they will alway look for their benefit and this will never change I see for the first time that three chiefs realised the importance of JCOs and put forward some thing which was never done before.
Looks like for the first time we have Chiefs who are knowing their job very well hope they succeed in their pursuit
Best regards .
Mahesh Yadav says
Once all PBOR’s knew that none of the officer or minister thought about PBOR’s till to date than to whom you are telling MSP should be same, who is going to take up your comments, it is understood that officers leave all responsibilities for all tasks on JCO’s but as the matter of other benafits the officers count all PBOR’s in one catageory, but for them they will count for any benafits senior officers and junior officers. furher let any Govt. to come situation will remain un changed for PBOR’s. Best Regards
SGT OP Ojha says
It’s surprising that Senior Non Commissioned Officer Mess is Made For Sergeant toMWO . This Is followed since the formation of RAF and subsequently changed to IAF. The US Army has Sgt To Sgt major equivalent to MWO of IAF.that is E1 to E9 Slightly change In Ranks structure.I would like Say this because Sergeant of IAF treated as Constable in civil during Aid to civil emergency.Hence Sergeant Are also be legally provided with Ranks like JWO To Warrants Officers.there should be slightly change In Ranks insigna.It should have been considered.
Amiraj Kumar SIngh says
What will be the exact pay for all the Ranks in Navy. and when it will be implemented in defence?
When Defence personnel will get their 7Th CPC benifit.
Why there is a huge difference between in MSP. All are soldiers, MSP shoule be same for all ranks. Please review.
SStomar says
All defence Person Officers and Men get items from CSD canteen at the same rate due to being in military service ( Ex. or serving). Despite, officers get higher pay due to their higher scales, All Officers or Men (PBOR) belong to Defence (Army, IAF and Navy). All fight in war and bullet also does not distinguish the category i.e. who is who, officer or man . MSP is due to Military service, Thus, MSP for Officers and men must be same, the different MSP Rs. 15500 for officers and Rs. 5200 for men is baseless. Concerned Authority in defence to consider it in the light of facts stated above. and put up to Govt. to consider the same MSP for all in 7th CPC.
Dr.v.a.thevar says
Is there any difference between Artificer diploma and mechanician diploma for X group pay
Sandeep Dubey says
What about Indian Coast Guard Technical Pay For Diploma Holder ?
Has it implemented ? Or not ?
HC Shukla says
There should be special scale for defence persons whose entry qualification is degree or above.like other central govt employees they should be given future career prospects. The existing disparity has demoralised.Presently the Education Instructor in Indian Air Force are teaching the trainees/airmen who are joining IAF after 12th or above.Central Govt has given their status as PGT but scale less than PRT.Thus starting salary of Education Instructor should be at par with PGT or more as they teach them who have been taught by PGT. Most of the Education Instructors are MA/M Sc with B Ed or teaching experience. Besides they under go more than one year training
.
P
sujit says
MSP should be equal to all. Why 5200, 15000 so much of gap? Pl reconsider.
Sub/Clk Vala H R says
Why clerks are not geting X group pay and it is also in the previous commissions that junior are getting more benefits than their seniors, these anomalies of 6th CPC should be clarified in the 7th CPC. Moreover, the MSP of a newly enrolled recruit and 28 year of service soldier are same, it should be adjusted according to their service.
Regi Varughese says
One way This is Good ….Let go. …
aditya mahapatra says
X gp pay should be abolished. Only flat rate of some Rupees for technical allowance except DA shouled be considered
Jyoti Arya says
Why should be difference in msp between the ranks?
Dakkata visweswararao says
Why esm vetrans not education allowance not yearly as per govt says two childrens maximum amount of 2250/- for moth each children why we are not getting last 3 years
SS says
Why should Military pay equal in Sepoy and Subedhar Major and equal ranks in Navy and Air Force
t s rawat says
Why disparities in military service pay should be equally for all ranks
Bhajram Nayak says
Cea claiming procedure should be easy. Should not be required any certificate by school. Only part 2 order publications for two children is sufficient.
Sunil kumar says
I think arrear policy wrong ?
Sunil says
Why the disparity in Group X Pay?